On 10/25/19 6:43 AM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Shifting the integer value 1U is evaluated with type unsigned int > using 32-bit arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects > a 64-bit value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix this > by using the BIT_ULL macro to perform the shift and avoid the overflow. Good catch, that should indeed have been 1ULL. I'll fold in your fix, thanks! -- Jens Axboe
