On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The expression !(hw_cap & XGMAC_HWFEAT_RAVSEL) >> 10 is always zero, so
> the masking operation is incorrect. Fix this by adding the missing
> parentheses to correctly bind the negate operator on the entire expression.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Operands don't affect result")
> Fixes: c2b69474d63b ("net: stmmac: xgmac: Correct RAVSEL field interpretation")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c
> index 965cbe3e6f51..2e814aa64a5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static void dwxgmac2_get_hw_feature(void __iomem *ioaddr,
> dma_cap->eee = (hw_cap & XGMAC_HWFEAT_EEESEL) >> 13;
> dma_cap->atime_stamp = (hw_cap & XGMAC_HWFEAT_TSSEL) >> 12;
> dma_cap->av = (hw_cap & XGMAC_HWFEAT_AVSEL) >> 11;
> - dma_cap->av &= !(hw_cap & XGMAC_HWFEAT_RAVSEL) >> 10;
> + dma_cap->av &= !((hw_cap & XGMAC_HWFEAT_RAVSEL) >> 10);
There is no point to the shift at all.
regards,
dan carpenter
