On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:25:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The
> > assignment is redundant and hence can be removed.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
> > if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
> > /* First, test without any prescaler when available */
> > prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
> > - pval = 1;
> > /*
> > * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds
> > * is not an integer so round it half up instead of
>
> Are you sure? It looks used to me.
Ah. Never mind. My tree was out of date.
regards,
dan carpenter
