On 10/1/19 4:54 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:53:10AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:02:19PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The "port->typec_caps.data" and "port->typec_caps.type" variables are
enums and in this context GCC will treat them as an unsigned int so they
can never be less than zero.
Fixes: ae8a2ca8a221 ("usb: typec: Group all TCPCI/TCPM code together")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
index 96562744101c..d3b63e000ae2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
@@ -4410,7 +4410,7 @@ static int tcpm_fw_get_caps(struct tcpm_port *port,
ret = fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "data-role", &cap_str);
if (ret == 0) {
port->typec_caps.data = typec_find_port_data_role(cap_str);
- if (port->typec_caps.data < 0)
+ if ((int)port->typec_caps.data < 0)
return -EINVAL;
Doesn't that also cause a warning about overwriting error return codes ?
I'm happy that you think there is a tool which generates warnings like
that but it's just people manually complaining. :P
I am quite sure there is, or at least used to be - I have seen such warnings.
Maybe it was removed.
Guenter
