On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:24:22PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:33:00PM +0530, Rohit Sarkar wrote: > > There are a lot of usages of "snprintf" throughout the staging > > directory (315 to be exact) > > Would it be worthwhile to find ones that may cause an information leak > > and replace them with "scnprintf"? > > A lot of times it's really easy to see that the uses are safe, so > snprintf() is fine in that case. If it's not obviously safe then change > it. > > regards, > dan carpenter > Sure, thanks a ton! regards, Rohit
