On 27/08/19 11:38, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We refactored this code a bit and accidentally deleted the "-" character
> from "-EINVAL". The kvm_vcpu_map() function never returns positive
> EINVAL.
>
> Fixes: c8e16b78c614 ("x86: KVM: svm: eliminate hardcoded RIP advancement from vmrun_interception()")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> From static analysis. I don't really know the impact.
>
>
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 1f220a85514f..ef646e22d1ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -3598,7 +3598,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> vmcb_gpa = svm->vmcb->save.rax;
>
> ret = kvm_vcpu_map(&svm->vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(vmcb_gpa), &map);
> - if (ret == EINVAL) {
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> kvm_inject_gp(&svm->vcpu, 0);
> return 1;
> } else if (ret) {
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
