>> How do you think about to reduce subsequent SmPL rules also according to >> a possible recombination of affected implementation details? > > There is not going to be any change with respect to this issue. I am curious if the software situation will be reconsidered any further under other circumstances. > It's fine when replacing one statement by another, but introduces complexity > when removing something more complex. Thanks for such information. > And there's not point to have something that works in only one special case. Will corresponding software development concerns be eventually discussed a bit more? Regards, Markus
