>> I proposed something also during the development for this SmPL script. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/24/274 >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/c98b8f50-1adf-ea95-a91c-ec451e9fefe2@xxxxxx/ > > Markus, > > This is not the first time you have suggested to someone to do something > that was simply incorrect. We come along different application expectations. > Please actually test your suggestions before proposing them. I dare to express also “questionable” development ideas. >> Should disjunctions eventually work in the semantic patch language also together with >> comparison operators? >> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/40 > > No. Can a similar effect be achieved by using a SmPL constraint for a metavariable of the type “binary operator”? https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/b4509f6e7fb06d5616bb19dd5a110b203fd0e566/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L266 >> Will any additional software adjustments be taken into account? > > No. I imagine that this view can change over time according to remaining feature requests. Regards, Markus
