On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:16 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 01/09/2019 à 18:04, Paul Moore a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 11:52 AM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Pointer iter is being initialized with a value that is never read and
> is being re-assigned a little later on. The assignment is redundant
> and hence can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This patch doesn't seem correct to me, at least not in current form.
> At the top of _netlbl_catmap_getnode() is a check to see if iter is
> NULL (as well as a few other checks on iter after that); this patch
> would break that code.
>
> Perhaps we can get rid of the iter/catmap assignment when we define
> iter, but I don't think this patch is the right way to do it.
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
> index 2b0ef55cf89e..409a3ae47ce2 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
> @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *_netlbl_catmap_getnode(
> */
> int netlbl_catmap_walk(struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *catmap, u32 offset)
> {
> - struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *iter = catmap;
> + struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *iter;
> u32 idx;
> u32 bit;
> NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE bitmap;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> 'iter' is reassigned a value between the declaration and the NULL test, so removing the fist initialisation looks good to me.
This is what I get when I try to review patches quickly while doing
other things on the weekend <sigh> ... yes, you are correct, I was
looking at _netlbl_catmap_getnode() and not netlbl_catmap_walk(); my
apologies.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
