From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The subtraction of the two pointers is automatically scaled by the
size of the size of the object the pointers point to, so the division
by sizeof(*i2400m->barker) is incorrect. This has been broken since
day one of the driver and is only debug, so remove the debug completely.
Also move && in condition to clean up a checkpatch warning.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Extra sizeof expression")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V2: completely remove debug, clean up checkpatch warning, change subject line
---
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
index 489cba9b284d..6c9a41bff2e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
@@ -397,14 +397,9 @@ int i2400m_is_boot_barker(struct i2400m *i2400m,
/* Short circuit if we have already discovered the barker
* associated with the device. */
- if (i2400m->barker
- && !memcmp(buf, i2400m->barker, sizeof(i2400m->barker->data))) {
- unsigned index = (i2400m->barker - i2400m_barker_db)
- / sizeof(*i2400m->barker);
- d_printf(2, dev, "boot barker cache-confirmed #%u/%08x\n",
- index, le32_to_cpu(i2400m->barker->data[0]));
+ if (i2400m->barker &&
+ !memcmp(buf, i2400m->barker, sizeof(i2400m->barker->data)))
return 0;
- }
for (i = 0; i < i2400m_barker_db_used; i++) {
barker = &i2400m_barker_db[i];
--
2.20.1
