please drop this mail.
On 2019/8/5 9:22, Mao Wenan wrote:
> There are two warnings in net/can, fix them by setting bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd
> and raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd as static.
>
> net/can/bcm.c:1683:5: warning: symbol 'bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/can/raw.c:840:5: warning: symbol 'raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: 473d924d7d46 ("can: fix ioctl function removal")
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1->v2: change patch description typo error, 'warings' to 'warnings'.
> net/can/bcm.c | 2 +-
> net/can/raw.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index bf1d0bbecec8..b8a32b4ac368 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
> @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@ static int bcm_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
> return size;
> }
>
> -int bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
> +static int bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> /* no ioctls for socket layer -> hand it down to NIC layer */
> diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
> index da386f1fa815..a01848ff9b12 100644
> --- a/net/can/raw.c
> +++ b/net/can/raw.c
> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int raw_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
> return size;
> }
>
> -int raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
> +static int raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> /* no ioctls for socket layer -> hand it down to NIC layer */
>
