On 02/08/2019 05.36, Mao Wenan wrote:
There are two warings in net/can, fix them by setting bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd
and raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd as static.
net/can/bcm.c:1683:5: warning: symbol 'bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/can/raw.c:840:5: warning: symbol 'raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: 473d924d7d46 ("can: fix ioctl function removal")
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Mao!
Btw. what kind of compiler/make switches are you using so that I can see
these warnings myself the next time?
Best regards,
Oliver
---
net/can/bcm.c | 2 +-
net/can/raw.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index bf1d0bbecec8..b8a32b4ac368 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@ static int bcm_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
return size;
}
-int bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+static int bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
/* no ioctls for socket layer -> hand it down to NIC layer */
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
index da386f1fa815..a01848ff9b12 100644
--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int raw_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
return size;
}
-int raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+static int raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
/* no ioctls for socket layer -> hand it down to NIC layer */
