Am 01.08.2019 10:39, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There are a few spelling mistakes "unknow" -> "unknown" and
> "enabeld" -> "enabled". Fix these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> index 13b2c8a60232..d029a99e600e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static const char* __smu_message_names[] = {
> const char *smu_get_message_name(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_message_type type)
> {
> if (type < 0 || type > SMU_MSG_MAX_COUNT)
> - return "unknow smu message";
> + return "unknown smu message";
> return __smu_message_names[type];
> }
>
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static const char* __smu_feature_names[] = {
> const char *smu_get_feature_name(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_feature_mask feature)
> {
> if (feature < 0 || feature > SMU_FEATURE_COUNT)
> - return "unknow smu feature";
> + return "unknown smu feature";
> return __smu_feature_names[feature];
> }
>
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ size_t smu_sys_get_pp_feature_mask(struct smu_context *smu, char *buf)
> count++,
> smu_get_feature_name(smu, i),
> feature_index,
> - !!smu_feature_is_enabled(smu, i) ? "enabeld" : "disabled");
> + !!smu_feature_is_enabled(smu, i) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
i am wondering,
is that !! really needed in front of smu_feature_is_enabled ?
re,
wh
> }
>
> failed:
