> @r@ > identifier f,i1,i2; > struct i1 e1; > expression e2; > position p; > @@ > \(strscpy\|strlcpy\)(e1.f, e2, i2)@p I have got the impression that the replacement can work also without an inherited position variable at the end. How do you think about to omit this SmPL rule then? Can it be nicer to reduce duplicate SmPL code a bit? Regards, Markus
