On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 10:52:23PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> [2019-07-06 16:05:17]: > > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 16:00:13 +0200 > > > > Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of > > a conditional statement. > > > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > kernel/sched/topology.c | 6 +----- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c > > index f751ce0b783e..6190eb52c30a 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c > > @@ -886,11 +886,7 @@ build_group_from_child_sched_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu) > > return NULL; > > > > sg_span = sched_group_span(sg); > > - if (sd->child) > > - cpumask_copy(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sd->child)); > > - else > > - cpumask_copy(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sd)); > > - > > + cpumask_copy(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sd->child ? sd->child : sd)); > > At runtime, Are we avoiding a function call? > However I think we are avoiding a branch instead of a conditional, which may > be beneficial. It all depends on what the compiler does; also this is super slow path stuff and the patch makes code less readable (IMO).
