On 7/8/19 10:42 AM, Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:26:47 +0200 > > A condition check was repeated in this function implementation despite of > a corresponding check in the stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable() function. > Thus delete redundant source code here. > > Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190707211638.sehikkear25dffah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> > --- > > v2: > Russell King pointed the change possibility out to omit a condition check > at this place. > > > drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c > index 8e6c9b3bcc29..773a1990b93f 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c > @@ -519,11 +519,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) > /* Write to Alarm register */ > writel_relaxed(alrmar, rtc->base + regs->alrmar); > > - if (alrm->enabled) > - stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 1); > - else > - stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 0); > - > + stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled); > end: > stm32_rtc_wpr_lock(rtc); > > -- > 2.22.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
