On Fri, 05 Jul 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 20:22:26 +0200
>
> Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
> a conditional statement.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/asic3.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/asic3.c b/drivers/mfd/asic3.c
> index 83b18c998d6f..50f5368fb170 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/asic3.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/asic3.c
> @@ -401,11 +401,10 @@ static int __init asic3_irq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> irq_base = asic->irq_base;
>
> for (irq = irq_base; irq < irq_base + ASIC3_NR_IRQS; irq++) {
> - if (irq < asic->irq_base + ASIC3_NUM_GPIOS)
> - irq_set_chip(irq, &asic3_gpio_irq_chip);
> - else
> - irq_set_chip(irq, &asic3_irq_chip);
> -
> + irq_set_chip(irq,
> + (irq < asic->irq_base + ASIC3_NUM_GPIOS)
> + ? &asic3_gpio_irq_chip
> + : &asic3_irq_chip);
The comparison better suits an if statement IMHO.
How about:
struct irq_chip *chip;
if (irq < asic->irq_base + ASIC3_NUM_GPIOS)
chip = &asic3_gpio_irq_chip;
else
chip = &asic3_irq_chip);
irq_set_chip(irq, chip);
> irq_set_chip_data(irq, asic);
> irq_set_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
> irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE);
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
