On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 17:11:37 +0200 > > Avoid an extra function call Not really. You've avoided an extra statement. > by using a ternary operator instead of a conditional statement for a > setting selection. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c > index 6cb1e41d58d0..02fc0778028e 100644 > --- a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c > +++ b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c > @@ -146,12 +146,10 @@ int cf_tlb_miss(struct pt_regs *regs, int write, int dtlb, int extension_word) > > mmu_write(MMUDR, (pte_val(*pte) & PAGE_MASK) | > ((pte->pte) & CF_PAGE_MMUDR_MASK) | MMUDR_SZ_8KB | MMUDR_X); > - > - if (dtlb) > - mmu_write(MMUOR, MMUOR_ACC | MMUOR_UAA); > - else > - mmu_write(MMUOR, MMUOR_ITLB | MMUOR_ACC | MMUOR_UAA); > - > + mmu_write(MMUOR, > + dtlb > + ? MMUOR_ACC | MMUOR_UAA > + : MMUOR_ITLB | MMUOR_ACC | MMUOR_UAA); If you are trying to avoid redundancy, why not finish the job? + mmu_write(MMUOR, (dtlb ? 0 : MMUOR_ITLB) | MMUOR_ACC | MMUOR_UAA); -- > local_irq_restore(flags); > return 0; > } > -- > 2.22.0 > >
