On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 05:47:50PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote: > >> tmp_ulist = ulist_alloc(GFP_KERNEL); > >> if (!roots || !tmp_ulist) { > >> ret = -ENOMEM; > >> + btrfs_free_path(path); > > > > This fixes only one leak, therere are more that I spotted while > > reviewing this patch. The gotos from the while-loop jump to > > out_free_list but that leave the path behind> > > That's why the exit block is a better place for the cleanups. This > > requires proper nesting of the cleanup calls, that's slightly > > inconvenient in this case. The free_path is before call to > > unlock_extent_cached so when the ordre is switched and free_path moved > > to out_free_ulist, then all the leaks are addressed in one go. > > Oh, yes. Even static analysis missed that too! > > > Bummer that the leaks escaped sight of original patch author (me), 2 > > reviewers and now 1 fix reviewer. > > > Given that you can see more issues, I'll leave the fix in your capable > hands. This --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4764,11 +4764,11 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, ret = emit_last_fiemap_cache(fieinfo, &cache); free_extent_map(em); out: - btrfs_free_path(path); unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, start + len - 1, &cached_state); out_free_ulist: + btrfs_free_path(path); ulist_free(roots); ulist_free(tmp_ulist); return ret; --- should fix it.