[PATCH][next] nvme-trace: fix spelling mistake "spcecific" -> "specific"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

There are two spelling mistakes in trace_seq_printf messages, fix these.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/trace.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/nvme/target/trace.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/trace.c b/drivers/nvme/host/trace.c
index f01ad0fd60bb..6980ab827233 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/trace.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/trace.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static const char *nvme_trace_fabrics_common(struct trace_seq *p, u8 *spc)
 {
 	const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p);
 
-	trace_seq_printf(p, "spcecific=%*ph", 24, spc);
+	trace_seq_printf(p, "specific=%*ph", 24, spc);
 	trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/trace.c b/drivers/nvme/target/trace.c
index cdcdd14c6408..6af11d493271 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/trace.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/trace.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static const char *nvmet_trace_fabrics_common(struct trace_seq *p, u8 *spc)
 {
 	const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p);
 
-	trace_seq_printf(p, "spcecific=%*ph", 24, spc);
+	trace_seq_printf(p, "specific=%*ph", 24, spc);
 	trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.20.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux