pon., 24 cze 2019 o 12:05 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
<lkml@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On 24.06.19 10:29, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > pt., 14 cze 2019 o 18:50 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:45:13 +0200
> >>
> >> Move the preprocessor statement “#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM” so that
> >> the corresponding scope for conditional compilation includes also comments
> >> for this function implementation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/base/platform.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> >> index 4d1729853d1a..a5f40974a6ef 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> >> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct resource *platform_get_resource(struct platform_device *dev,
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
> >>
> >> /**
> >> * devm_platform_ioremap_resource - call devm_ioremap_resource() for a platform
> >> @@ -87,7 +88,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource);
> >> * resource management
> >> * @index: resource index
> >> */
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
> >> void __iomem *devm_platform_ioremap_resource(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >> unsigned int index)
> >> {
> >> --
> >> 2.22.0
> >>
> >
> > And what is the purpose of that?
>
> I can imagine that this could improve readability a little bit. Maybe if
> one uses same fancy ide/editor that can fold code blocks like functions
> and conditionals, this patch could make the code prettier.
>
> The patch seems pretty trivial and doesn't change any actual code, so
> I don't see hard resons for rejecting it.
>
In its current form it makes the code even less readable. The #ifdef
should actually be one line lower and touch the comment instead of the
EXPORT_SYMBOL() related to a different function.
Bart
