On 2019/6/22 21:06, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Mao Wenan wrote:
>
>> There is one warning:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c: In function ‘amdgpu_pmu_init’:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c:249:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> int ret = 0;
>> ^
>> amdgpu_pmu_init() is called by amdgpu_device_init() in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c,
>> which will use the return value. So it returns 'ret' for caller.
>> amdgpu_device_init()
>> r = amdgpu_pmu_init(adev);
>>
>> Fixes: 9c7c85f7ea1f ("drm/amdgpu: add pmu counters")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v1->v2: change the subject for this patch; change the indenting when it calls init_pmu_by_type; use the value 'ret' in
>> amdgpu_pmu_init().
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c
>> index 0e6dba9..145e720 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmu.c
>> @@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ int amdgpu_pmu_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> case CHIP_VEGA20:
>> /* init df */
>> ret = init_pmu_by_type(adev, df_v3_6_attr_groups,
>> - "DF", "amdgpu_df", PERF_TYPE_AMDGPU_DF,
>> - DF_V3_6_MAX_COUNTERS);
>> + "DF", "amdgpu_df", PERF_TYPE_AMDGPU_DF,
>> + DF_V3_6_MAX_COUNTERS);
>>
>> /* other pmu types go here*/
>
> I don't know what is the impact of the other pmu types that are planned
> for the future. Perhaps it would be better to abort the function
> immediately in the case of a failure.
I guess it would be better to use new function or new switch case clause to process different PMU types
in future.
>
> julia
>
>> break;
>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ int amdgpu_pmu_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>
>
