On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I think that something like
> >
> > if (IS_ERR(e))
> > {
> > <+...
> > *dev_err(...)
> > ...+>
> > }
> >
> > would be more appropriate. Whether there is a return or not doesn't
> > really matter.
>
> Do you find the following SmPL change specification useful and acceptable?
>
>
> @deletion depends on patch@
> expression e;
> @@
> e = devm_ioremap_resource(...);
> if (IS_ERR(e))
> (
> -{
> - dev_err(...);
> return (...);
I still don't see the point of specifying return. Why not just S, where S
is a statement metavariable?
julia
> -}
> |{
I realize that you confuse conciseness with readability, but it would
really look better to have the | on a line by itself.
julia
> <+...
> - dev_err(...);
> ...+>
> }
> )
>
>
> Would this approach need a version check for the Coccinelle software?
Why would that be necessary?
