Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:55:29 -0700
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx>, Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx>, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190618081645.GM16364@dell>
References: <CAHk-=wgTL5sYCGxX8+xQqyBRWRUE05GAdL58+UTG8bYwjFxMkw@mail.gmail.com> <20190617190605.GA21332@mwanda> <20190618081645.GM16364@dell>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:16 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Ideally we can get a review too.

Looks fine to me, but obviously somebody should actually _test_ it too.

              Linus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()
  - From: Lee Jones

References:
- [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()
  - From: Dan Carpenter
- Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()
  - From: Lee Jones

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: idle-page: fix oops because end_pfn is larger than max_pfn
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: tcmu: Simplify 'tcmu_update_uio_info()'
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix an endian bug in stmfx_irq_handler()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]