On 07/05/2019 09:32, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 19-05-07 09:21, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Currently the less than zero comparison of val is always false because
>> val is an unsigned int. Fix this by making val a signed int.
>
> Thanks for covering that, was an copy 'n' paste failure..
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against zero")
>> Fixes: a33ff45923c8 ("Input: qt1050 - add Microchip AT42QT1050 support")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/keyboard/qt1050.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/qt1050.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/qt1050.c
>> index 6b1603cb7515..4debddb13972 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/qt1050.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/qt1050.c
>> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static struct regmap_config qt1050_regmap_config = {
>>
>> static bool qt1050_identify(struct qt1050_priv *ts)
>> {
>> - unsigned int val;
>> + int val;
>
> I think the proper solution is to add a ret val, because this covers the
> success/fail. I will send a patch to fix this.
OK, thanks for the follow-up fix.
Regards,
Colin
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>> /* Read Chip ID */
>> regmap_read(ts->regmap, QT1050_CHIP_ID, &val);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>>
>
