On 4/18/2019 10:23 PM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
There is a spelling mistake in a nvkm_debug message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
-Mukesh
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
index 8bcb7e79a0cb..456aed1f2a02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ gk104_ram_calc_xits(struct gk104_ram *ram, struct nvkm_ram_data *next)
nvkm_error(subdev, "unable to calc plls\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "sucessfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "successfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
" (refclock: %i kHz)\n", next->freq, ret);
} else {
/* calculate refpll coefficients */
