Re: [PATCH -next] bus: ti-sysc: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in sysc_init_resets()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bus: ti-sysc: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in sysc_init_resets()
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:43:49 -0700
Cc: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190411024708.123605-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
References: <20190411024708.123605-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

* YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> [190411 02:36]:
> Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR

Thanks but I'll rather skip this one as I find it a bit hard
to read unless there's some reasoning other than compress
few lines out of the code.

Regards,

TOny

References:
- [PATCH -next] bus: ti-sysc: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in sysc_init_resets()
  - From: YueHaibing

Prev by Date: [PATCH] qede: fix write to free'd pointer error and double free of ptp
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][next] RDMA/mlx5: check for error return in flow_rule rather than err
Previous by thread: [PATCH -next] bus: ti-sysc: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in sysc_init_resets()
Next by thread: [PATCH -next] memstick: remove set but not used variable 'data'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux