On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:19 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Applied to linux-kbuild. > > > > A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script. > > > Sorry for my bad job. > > I usually use LKML patchwork to find patches. > > When I searched "Wen Yang", v6 did not show up for some reasons. > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=&submitter=22638&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate= > > So, I just thought v5 was the latest one > and I was completely missing the context. I think it is a minor detail that will have no impact in practice. julia > > > Apology. > > Masahiro > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=da9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916befcb6b6d7e8 > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be > > improved further. > > Which changes will get the desired acceptance? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html > > > > Regards, > > Markus > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada >
