Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] lib/sort & lib/list_sort: faster and smaller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/03/2019 09.15, George Spelvin wrote:
> 
> Because CONFIG_RETPOLINE has made indirect calls much more expensive,
> I thought I'd try to reduce the number made by the library sort
> functions.

For the series,

Acked-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

and let's have more commits with such detailed changelogs and references
to academic work combined with "but in the real world we have to do this
and that tradeoff..." :)



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux