Re: [PATCH] lib/test_rhashtable: fix spelling mistake "existant" -> "existent"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/test_rhashtable: fix spelling mistake "existant" -> "existent"
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Cc: tgraf@xxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190217225209.17536-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
References: <20190217225209.17536-1-colin.king@canonical.com>

From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 22:52:09 +0000

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> There are spelling mistakes in warning macro messages. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to net-next.

References:
- [PATCH] lib/test_rhashtable: fix spelling mistake "existant" -> "existent"
  - From: Colin King

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test_firmware: silence underflow warning in test_dev_config_update_u8()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: potential NULL dereference in tcf_block_find()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] lib/test_rhashtable: fix spelling mistake "existant" -> "existent"
Next by thread: [PATCH] drm: fix spelling mistake "intead" -> "instead"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux