Re: [Cocci] [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missingput_device()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> We don't need perfection.
>>
>> I guess that you noticed in the meantime that I dare to propose
>> more software development efforts in such a direction.
>
> Yes, this is noticable.

I am curious then if remaining change suggestions will be picked up
by more software developers and reviewers.


> It is your choice, however, other people may have their reasons
> for other choices...

Yes, of course.


>>> We need more to eliminate the memory leaks.
>
> ... like this one.
>
>> Will this view evolve into further helpful and constructive clarifications?
>
> Given my above, what is the evaluation of the same question to yourself?

* I hope that my contributions can improve the situation also
  for this software area.

* Existing development tools will evolve further as usual.

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux