It's confusing to call PTR_ERR(v). The PTR_ERR() function is basically
a fancy cast to long so it makes you wonder, was IS_ERR() intended? But
that doesn't make sense because vcc_walk() doesn't return error
pointers.
This patch doesn't affect runtime, it's just a cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/atm/proc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/atm/proc.c b/net/atm/proc.c
index 0b0495a41bbe..d79221fd4dae 100644
--- a/net/atm/proc.c
+++ b/net/atm/proc.c
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ static void vcc_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
static void *vcc_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
v = vcc_walk(seq, 1);
- *pos += !!PTR_ERR(v);
+ if (v)
+ (*pos)++;
return v;
}
--
2.17.1
