On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 08:12:34PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> From dc70ddb39c2f8d87d64b8d0fd71f4baa956d5f50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 10:39:44 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf] bpf: refactor bpf_test_run() to separate own failures
> and test program result
>
> After commit f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local
> storage") the bpf_test_run() function may fail with -ENOMEM, if
> it's not possible to allocate memory for a cgroup local storage.
>
> This error shouldn't be mixed with the return value of the testing
> program. Let's add an additional argument with a pointer where to
> store the testing program's result; and make bpf_test_run()
> return either 0 or -ENOMEM.
>
> Fixes: f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage")
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to bpf tree. Thanks!
