On Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2018 18:14:18 CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Static analysis with CoverityScan is throwing warnings that specific
> case statements are missing breaks. Rather than adding breaks, add
> return -EINVAL to the specific case statements to clarify the
> error return paths. Fix also saves 50 bytes.
>
> Before:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 21418 4936 128 26482 6772 drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
>
> After:
> dec hex filename
> 21370 4936 128 26434 6742 drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
>
> (gcc 8.2, x86-64)
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462408 ("Missing break in switch")
>
> ---
>
> V2: use returns instead of break statements to keep with the
> current style used in the switch statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> index d1239624187d..bdd7cba6f6b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> *val2 = chip->shunt_resistor_uohm;
> return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
> }
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
> switch (chan->address) {
> @@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> *val = chip->range_vbus == 32 ? 1 : 2;
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> return -EINVAL;
--
Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
