Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The return statement is redundant as there is a return statement
> immediately before it so we have dead code that can be removed.
> Also remove the unused declaration of ret.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1473793 ("Structurally dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> index 5a6b70ba137a..260650bb5560 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> @@ -1738,7 +1738,6 @@ static int vmw_cmd_check_define_gmrfb(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
> void *buf)
> {
> struct vmw_buffer_object *vmw_bo;
> - int ret;
>
> struct {
> uint32_t header;
> @@ -1748,7 +1747,6 @@ static int vmw_cmd_check_define_gmrfb(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
> return vmw_translate_guest_ptr(dev_priv, sw_context,
> &cmd->body.ptr,
> &vmw_bo);
> - return ret;
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
