On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Mao Wenan wrote:
> There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
> since new value always be assigned before use it.
The code is:
static int prev_max;
/*
* Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
* print a new message when reaching the limit again.
*/
if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) {
So it is referenced before it is initialized.
julia
>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> index 2823d41..ba70db8 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
> * We limit the lock chain length for each invocation.
> */
> if (++depth > max_lock_depth) {
> - static int prev_max;
> + int prev_max;
>
> /*
> * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
