Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] treewide: Use array_size() for kmalloc()-family

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> * The repetition of such a constraint in subsequent SmPL rules could be avoided
>>   if inheritance will be used for this metavariable.
> 
> This is quite incorrect.

I suggest to consider additional software design options.


> Inheritance is only possible when a match of the previous rule has succeeded.

I agree with this information.


> If a rule never applies in a given file, the rules that inherit from it
> won't apply either.

I would like to point the possibility out to specify a source code search
which will find interesting function calls at least by an inital SmPL rule.


> Furthermore, what is inherited is the value, not the constraint.

This technical detail can be fine.


> If the original binding of alloc only ever matches kmalloc,
> then the inherited references will only match kmalloc too.

Can the desired search pattern be extended in significant ways?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux