On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 02:02 +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 2409a976a299 ("pnfs: Add LAYOUTGET to OPEN of a new file")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index d93942f..1ff1998 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ struct pnfs_layout_segment *
> struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
>
> spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
> - lo = pnfs_find_alloc_layout(ino, ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
> + lo = pnfs_find_alloc_layout(ino, ctx, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!lo)
> goto out_unlock;
> if (!test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID_STID, &lo->plh_flags))
>
Hi Wei,
The ino->i_lock spinlock is temporarily dropped inside
pnfs_find_alloc_layout() if we have to perform an allocation, so the
existing code should be correct.
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
CTO, Hammerspace Inc
4300 El Camino Real, Suite 105
Los Altos, CA 94022
www.hammer.space id="-x-evo-selection-end-marker">��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�ޗ�����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
