On 01-06-18, 14:05, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The function acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch is local to the source and does
> not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:468:14: warning: symbol
> 'acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 9449657d72f0..32ba4bc972e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -465,8 +465,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> return result;
> }
>
> -unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> - unsigned int target_freq)
> +static unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
