Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: silence an uninitialized variable warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:02:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-05-18, 11:49, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Smatch complains that "rate" can be uninitialized here.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
> > index 7026e9f484ea..afc844806db0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
> > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
> > @@ -317,7 +317,8 @@ static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct device *dev,
> >  
> >  	/* Check if the OPP supports hardware's hierarchy of versions or not */
> >  	if (!_opp_is_supported(dev, opp_table, np)) {
> > -		dev_dbg(dev, "OPP not supported by hardware: %llu\n", rate);
> > +		dev_dbg(dev, "OPP not supported by hardware: %lu\n",
> > +			new_opp->rate);
> >  		goto free_opp;
> >  	}
> 
> Well, I never got that warning nor did the buildbot report me anything
> like that. Not sure how you got that :)
> 
> But AFAICT, there is indeed a path where this can happen and I am not
> sure the proposed solution is the most readable one. I would rather
> initialize rate to 0 while defining it at the top.
> 

Sure.  No problem.  I'll resend.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux