[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 103/293] x86/nmi: Fix timeout test in test_nmi_ipi()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit c133c7615751008f6c32ccae7cdfc5ff6e989c35 ]

We're supposed to exit the loop with "timeout" set to zero.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 99e8b9ca90d6 ("x86, NMI: Add NMI IPI selftest")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170619105304.GA23995@elgon.mountain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
index 6d9582ec0324..d27f8d84c4ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
 
 	/* Don't wait longer than a second */
 	timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
-	while (!cpumask_empty(mask) && timeout--)
+	while (!cpumask_empty(mask) && --timeout)
 	        udelay(1);
 
 	/* What happens if we timeout, do we still unregister?? */
-- 
2.15.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux