Re: [PATCH] test_bpf: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check in test_skb_segment()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David,

On 03/28/2018 06:19 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> On 3/28/18 4:48 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> The skb_segment() function returns error pointers on error.  It never
>> returns NULL.
>>
>> Fixes: 76db8087c4c9 ("net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module")
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
>> index b2badf6b23cd..8e157806df7a 100644
>> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
>> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
>> @@ -6649,7 +6649,7 @@ static __init int test_skb_segment(void)
>>       }
>>         segs = skb_segment(skb, features);
>> -    if (segs) {
>> +    if (!IS_ERR(segs)) {
>>           kfree_skb_list(segs);
>>           ret = 0;
>>           pr_info("%s: success in skb_segment!", __func__);
> 
> Oh, my bad. Thanks for the fix!
> Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>

If you have a chance, please take this fix directly into your net-next tree
since it also contains the original commit 76db8087c4c9 ("net: bpf: add a
test for skb_segment in test_bpf module"), which is not in the bpf-next tree
at this point.

Thanks a lot,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux