Re: [PATCH] xen/acpi: off by one in read_acpi_id()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 28/03/18 13:47, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > If acpi_id is == nr_acpi_bits, then we access one element beyond the end
> > of the acpi_psd[] array or we set one bit beyond the end of the bit map
> > when we do __set_bit(acpi_id, acpi_id_cst_present);
> > 
> > Fixes: 59a568029181 ("xen/acpi-processor: C and P-state driver that uploads said data to hypervisor.")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
> > index c80195e8fbd1..d23c9c150199 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
> > @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ read_acpi_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >  	}
> >  	/* There are more ACPI Processor objects than in x2APIC or MADT.
> >  	 * This can happen with incorrect ACPI SSDT declerations. */
> > -	if (acpi_id > nr_acpi_bits) {
> > +	if (acpi_id >= nr_acpi_bits) {
> >  		pr_debug("We only have %u, trying to set %u\n",
> >  			 nr_acpi_bits, acpi_id);
> 
> Can you please modify this message, too? E.g. something like:
> 
> pr_debug("max acpi id %u, trying to set %u\n",
>          nr_acpi_bits - 1, acpi_id);
> 
> With that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> 

Sure, let me resend.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux