>> @@ -797,12 +792,18 @@ static int btmrvl_sdio_card_to_host(struct btmrvl_private *priv)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> -exit:
>> - if (ret) {
>> - hdev->stat.err_rx++;
>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>> - }
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +free_skb:
>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>> +e_io:
>> + ret = -EIO;
>> + goto increment_counter;
>>
>> +e_inval:
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> +increment_counter:
>> + hdev->stat.err_rx++;
>> return ret;
>
> Nope!
>
> This is not easier to read for me. This goto exit jumping and I hate that.
Can the software design direction become feasible to omit the repeated check
for the variable “ret” (and further initialisations)?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
