Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Delete an unnecessary return statement in two functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15-02-18, 20:30, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:14:32 +0100
> 
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
> 
> WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
> 
> Thus remove such a statement in the affected functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> index 460bf22a8a2b..782a8c2a359d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> @@ -122,14 +122,12 @@ static int query_current_values_with_pending_wait(struct powernow_k8_data *data)
>  static void count_off_irt(struct powernow_k8_data *data)
>  {
>  	udelay((1 << data->irt) * 10);
> -	return;
>  }
>  
>  /* the voltage stabilization time */
>  static void count_off_vst(struct powernow_k8_data *data)
>  {
>  	udelay(data->vstable * VST_UNITS_20US);
> -	return;
>  }
>  
>  /* need to init the control msr to a safe value (for each cpu) */

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux