On 2018/2/9 19:33, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:10:46 +0800 > jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Eric and Greg, >> >> I encountered the similar problem with create-unlink-getattr idiom. >> I use the testcase that create-unlink-setattr idiom, and I see the >> bug is reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1336794. >> Then I also see you already fix the issue and push the patch to upstream. >> https://github.com/ericvh/linux/commit/eaf70223eac094291169f5a6de580351890162a2 >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626194/ >> >> Unfortunately, the two patches are not merged into master, I don't know >> the reason, so I suggest if the patche can be merged into master, and >> it will solve the create-unlink-getattr idiom. >> > > I had tried to go a bit further and address the general issue of f*() syscalls > versus unlinked files: > > QEMU: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg07586.html > > Linux 9p driver: > https://sourceforge.net/p/v9fs/mailman/message/35175775/ > > I remember that some issues were then reported during review of the > linux patches, and I never got bandwidth to investigate further... > > But if you'd like to resurrect these threads, please do. :) > >> Thanks, >> Yiwen >> > > Cheers, > > -- > Greg > > . > Thanks Greg, Ok, we will move forward, I hope we can solve these problems that you encountered. Thanks, Yiwen. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
