Re: hid-sensor-accel-3d: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in hid_accel_3d_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5 February 2018 18:26:59 GMT, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If making changes like this I would suggest only sending one until
>> you have have a response from the relevant maintainer.
>
>The corresponding feedback can become more positive for such
>a transformation pattern after a while, can't it?

Not in that sort of time period.
>
>
>> It would save you time as often these sorts of changes are
>> a matter of personal taste and weighing up of costs vs gains
>> - hence it is not obvious that they will be accepted.
>
>Can the wording “WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message”
>(from the script “checkpatch.pl”) be another incentive?

No. The key word is possible. Check patch is dumb and often gives false positives.
>
>Regards,
>Markus

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux