On 5 February 2018 18:26:59 GMT, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If making changes like this I would suggest only sending one until >> you have have a response from the relevant maintainer. > >The corresponding feedback can become more positive for such >a transformation pattern after a while, can't it? Not in that sort of time period. > > >> It would save you time as often these sorts of changes are >> a matter of personal taste and weighing up of costs vs gains >> - hence it is not obvious that they will be accepted. > >Can the wording “WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message” >(from the script “checkpatch.pl”) be another incentive? No. The key word is possible. Check patch is dumb and often gives false positives. > >Regards, >Markus -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
