>> I am curious if more positive feedback could evolve till then. >> I would appreciate if a potentially needed resend for my selection >> of update suggestions could become smaller (when reviewed steps >> could be already integrated for example). > > I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say, > in any of your responses. I imagine that acceptance for these changes could be influenced also by review comments from other contributors. > Are you using Google Translate to convert between your > first language and English? No. > If you want to rebase your patches, to see what has been applied and > what hasn't, you can use the MFD repo and its next-next branch. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=for-mfd-next-next How are the chances that further update suggestions will be integrated just because I sent them as small patch series in the threaded way? Examples: * tps65910: Adjustments for four function implementations https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/313 * abx500-core: Adjustments for eight function implementations https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/186 Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
