Re: [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> should be replaced with NULL test.
> 
> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>  
>  	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
> -	if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
> +	if (!iio) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
> -		return PTR_ERR(iio);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	adc = iio_priv(iio);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This one doesn't return an error pointer either.  The check causes a
static check warning for me.  (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
it will return an error pointer in the future?)

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux