On Tue 09-01-18 23:06:00, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We aren't holding the hugetlb_lock so there is no need to unlock. > > Fixes: b27f11e5e675 ("mm, hugetlb: get rid of surplus page accounting tricks") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> Ups, a left over after refactoring. Andrew, could you fold this into mm-hugetlb-further-simplify-hugetlb-allocation-api.patch please? > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > index ffcae114ceed..742a929f2311 100644 > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > @@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask, > > page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask); > if (!page) > - goto out_unlock; > + return NULL; > > spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock); > /* -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html